It's entirely pedantic but that's fine because I l...

2009-02-25T09:54:00.000-08:00

It's entirely pedantic but that's fine because I like accurate and you are correct.

What I normally term that style of picture is long exposure because it is literally accurate (i.e. I artificially force the exposure of the shot to something ridiculously long like 4-5 seconds).

Not sure entirely why it is that I called it the wrong thing but I'll blame my stomach thinking of food at the time.

Ernie is remarkably still when I use long exposure shots. I've noted it many times in many shots. Everyone else = lots of motion.

B&W makes all the difference in highlighting the contrast.

Not to be pedantic, but that's not time-lapse. Tim...

2009-02-25T09:41:00.000-08:00

Not to be pedantic, but that's not time-lapse. Time-lapse is a cinematography technique in which the frames are captured more slowly than played back, giving the impression of something happening faster than it really did.

What you have here is an interesting example of motion blur. I especially like the contrast between the two subjects (one moving a lot, one remaining relatively still.)

Comments on Pacho's blag: You always neglect the ones you love...

It's entirely pedantic but that's fine because I l...

Not to be pedantic, but that's not time-lapse. Tim...